NIŠTAVOST I NEPUNOVAŽNOST UGOVORA KAO POSLEDICA KRŠENJA PRAVA KONKURENCIJE EU I PRAVILA O JAVNIM NABAVKAMA
Apstrakt
Rad će se fokusirati na zahteve koje postavlja pravo EU u pogledu ništavosti i nepunovažnosti ugovora u određenim oblastima koje su povezane sa funkcionisanjem unutrašnjeg tržišta: pravo konkurencije, uključujući restriktivne sporazume, zloupotrebu dominantnog položaja, kontrolu koncentracija i državnu pomoć i pravila o javnim nabavkama. Domen primene pravila o ništavosti koja su zasnovana na pravu EU je ograničen i samo je u čl. 101 (2) Ugovora o funkcionisanju Evropske unije izričito predviđena ništavost restriktivnih sporazuma. U slučaju zloupotrebe dominantnog položaja, ništavost ugovora može da proistekne iz principa efikasnosti prava EU. Punovažnost ili ništavost ugovora koji krše klauzulu suspenzije u režimu kontrole koncentracija se procenjuje u dva trenutka – pre odluke o spajanju i nakon odluke Evropske komisije. Režim državne pomoći ne može da se oslanja na ništavost ugovora kojima se krše pravila EU o državnoj pomoći na osnovu prava EU. Konačno, pravila o javnim nabavkama su, čini se, najsloženija u tom smislu, jer funkcionišu u smislu „prava“ ugovorne strane da raskine ugovor i ovlašćenja tela koje vrši reviziju da proglasi „nepunovažnim“ ugovor koji je nelegalno dodeljen. Stoga se predlaže revizija direktiva.
Reference
Besselink, L. F. M. 2010. National and constitutional identity before and after Lisbon. Utrecht Law Review, 6(3), pp. 36-49. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.139.
Cortese, B. 2020. State Aid Law as a passepartout: Shouldn’t We Stop Taking the Effect on Trade for Granted?. Bratislava Law Review, 4(1), pp. 9–18. https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2020.4.1.194.
Delicostopoulos, J. S. 2003. Towards European Procedural Primacy in National Legal Systems. European Law Journal, 9(5), pp. 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-0386.2003.00194.x.
Goyder, J. & Dons, M. 2017. Damages Claims Based on State Aid Law Infringements. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 16(3), pp. 416–428. https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2017/3/10
Gyárfaš, J. 2017. Hic Sunt Leones: Private Enforcement of State Aid Law in Slovakia. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 16(3), pp. 453–467. https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2017/3/14.
Halonen, K.-M. 2017. Termination of a Public Contract – lifting the veil on Art. 73 of 2014/24 Directive. Public Procurement Law Review, 5, pp. 187–198.
Honoré, M., & Jensen, N. E. 2017. Damages in State Aid Cases. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 10(2), pp. 265–286. https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2011/2/227.
Jouve, D. 2017. Recovering Unlawful and Incompatible Aids by National Courts: CELF and Scott/Kimberly Clark Cases. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 16(3), pp. 366–376. https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2017/3/6.
Köhler, M. 2017. Private Enforcement of State Aid Law – Problems of Guaranteeing EU Rights by means of National (Procedural) Law. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 11(2), pp. 369–387. https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2012/2/279.
Kubera, P. 2020. State Aid rules and public financing of infrastructure. The Case of Autostrada. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 10(1), pp. 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0005.
Martin-Ehlers, A. 2017. Private Enforcement of State Aid Law in Germany. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 10(4), pp. 737-740. https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2011/4/255.
Mock, S. 2002. Harmonization, Regulation and Legislative Competition in European Corporate Law. German Law Journal, 3(12), E5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200015649.
Nazzini, R. 2006. Article 81 EC between time present and time: A ‘normative critique’ of restriction of competition in EU law. Common Market Law Review, 43(2), pp. 497-536.
O’Donoghue, R. & Padilla, J. 2020. Law and Economics of Article 102 TFEU. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ordóñez-Solís, D. 2017. Waiting for National Judges in Infringement Proceedings on State Aid. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 16(3), pp. 377–392. https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2017/3/7.
Pärn-Lee, E. 2020. The Origins of Supranational State Aid Legislations : What Policymakers Must Know and Adhere to. The Case of Estonia. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 10(1), pp. 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0007.
Pastor-Merchante, F. 2016. The Protection of Competitors under State Aid Law. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 15(4), pp. 527–538. https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2016/4/5.
Pinto, C. S. 2016. The “Narrow” Meaning of the Legitimate Expectations Principle in State Aid Law Versus the Foreign Investor’s Legitimate Expectations. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 15(2), pp. 270-285.
Ritzenhoff, L. 2014. Legitimate Expectations in Reasonable Delay – Regional aid to Hotels in Sardegna. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 13(4), pp. 729–734.
Scalise, R. J. 2014. Rethinking the Doctrine of Nullity. Louisiana Law Review, 74(3), pp. 663–718.
Schmid, D. 2002. (Do) We Need a European Civil Code (?). Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, XVIII(1), pp. 263–293.
Stehlík, V. 2018. Interim measures before national courts in the context of EU and Czech law. International and Comparative Law Review, 12(2), pp. 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/iclr-2016-0084.
Weatherill, S. 2012. Maximum versus Minimum Harmonization: Choosing between Unity and Diversity in the Search for the Soul of the Internal Market. In: Shuibhne, N.N. & Gormley, L. (eds.), From Single Market to Economic Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695706.003.0010.
Zingales, N. 2010. Member State Liability vs. National Procedural Autonomy: What Rules for Judicial Breach of EU Law?. German Law Journal, 11(4), pp. 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200018617.
Website references
OECD. 2019. Suspensory Effects of Merger Notifications and Gun Jumping. Available at: https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP(2018)11/en/pdf.
Legal sources
European Commission (2020a). Albania 2020 Report. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels, 6.10.2020, SWD (2020) 354 final. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/albania_report_2020.pdf
European Commission (2020b) Montenegro 2020 Report. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels, 6.10.2020, SWD (2020) 353 final. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/montenegro_report_2020.pdf
European Commission (2020c). North Macedonia 2020 Report. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels, 6.10.2020, SWD (2020) 351 final. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/north_macedonia_report_2020.pdf
European Commission (2020d). Serbia 2020 Report. Commission Staff Working Document.
Brussels, 6.10.2020, SWD (2020) 352 final. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/serbia_report_2020.pdf
European Commission (2020e). Bosna and Herzegovina 2020 Report. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels, 6.10.2020, SWD (2020) 350 final. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/bosnia_and_herzegovina_report_2020.pdf
European Commission (2020f). Kosovo 2020 Report. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels, 6.10.2020, SWD (2020) 350 final. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/kosovo_report_2020.pdf
EU Directive 1989. Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts. OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 33–35.
EU Directive 2007. Directive 2007/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC with regard to improving the effectiveness of review procedures concerning the award of public contracts (Text with EEA relevance). OJ L 335, 20.12.2007, p. 31–46.
EU Directive 2014. Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance. OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65–242.
EU General Block Exemption Regulation 2010. Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (Text with EEA relevance) OJ L 102, 23.4.2010, p. 1–7
EU Notice 2009. Commission notice on the enforcement of State aid law by national courts.
OJ C 85, 9.4.2009, p. 1–22.
EU Regulation 2003. Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance) OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1–25
EU Regulation 2004. Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1–22
EU Regulation 2015. Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9–29.
Ahmed Saeed Flugreisen and Silver Line Reisebüro GmbH v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V. Judgment of the Court of 11 April 1989. Case 66/86. ECLI:EU:C:1989:140
Béguelin Import Co. v S.A.G.L. Import Export. Judgment of the Court of 25 November 1971. ECLI:EU:C:1971:113
Belgische Radio en Televisie a société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs v SV SABAM a NV Fonior (BRT II). Judgment of the Court of 37 March 1974. Case 127-73. ECLI:EU:C:1974:25
CELF I. Centre d’exportation du livre français (CELF) and Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication v Société internationale de diffusion et d’édition (SIDE). Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 February 2008. Case C-199/06. EU:C:2008:79
CEPSA Estaciones de Servicio SA v LV Tobar e Hijos SL. Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2008. Case C-279/06. ECLI:EU:C:2008:485
Commission v Germany. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 July 2007. Case C-503/04. ECLI:EU:C:2007:432
Éditions Odile Jacob v Commission. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 6 November 2012, Case C-551/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:681
Ernst & Young P/S v Konkurrencerådet. Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 31 May 2018. Case C-633/16. ECLI:EU:C:2018:371
Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v Commission of the European Economic Community. Judgment of the Court of 13 July 1966. Joined cases 56 and 58-64. ECLI:EU:C:1966:41
MedEval - Qualitäts-, Leistungs- und Struktur-Evaluierung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH. Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 November 2015. Case C-166/14. ECLI:EU:C:2015:779
SA Brasserie de Haecht v Wilkin-Janssen. Haecht II. Judgment of the Court of 6 February 1973. Case 48-72. ECLI:EU:C:1973:11
Société de Vente de Ciments et Bétons de l’Est SA v Kerpen & Kerpen GmbH und Co. KG. Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 December 1983. Case 319/82. ECLI:EU:C:1983:374
Société Technique Minière (L.T.M.) v Maschinenbau Ulm GmbH (M.B.U). Judgment of the Court of 30 June 1966. Case 56-65. ECLI:EU:C:1966:38
Stefan Rudigier. Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 September 2018. Case C-518/17. EU:C:2018:757
VAG France SA v Établissements Magne SA. Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 1986. Case 10/86. ECLI:EU:C:1986:502
Slovakia, Judgment of 14 September 2018, Mesto Trnava v City-Arena, a.s., City-Arena PLUS, a.s., case No 39C/30/2017, ECLI:SK:2117221806.
