USLOVI ZA ZAŠTITU AUTORSKOG DELA U PRAVU SJEDINJENIH AMERIČKIH DRŽAVA

Ključne reči: autorsko delo, autorsko pravo, pravo SAD, autorska zaštita

Apstrakt

U radu su analizirani uslovi koje duhovna tvorevina mora ispuniti prema pravu Sjedinjenih Američkih Država da bi se smatrala autorskim delom. Osim osobenosti koje su rezultat anglosaksonskog koncepta autorskog prava, prisutne su i druge specifičnosti kao što je naročita, ustavom predviđena, svrha autorskog prava u promovisanju učenja, očuvanju javnog domena i zaštiti prava autora. Na osnovu odredaba saveznog Zakona o autorskom pravu (17 U.S.C) i primera iz sudske prakse, autor objašnjava kako se tumači originalnost dela, uslov da je delo otelotvoreno u materijalizovanom nosiocu i koje su tipične vrste autorskih dela. Pored toga ukazuje se na razlike u shvatanju autorstva, na promenjeni značaj registracije posle ratifikacije Bernske konvencije i na problem zaštite dela nepoznatih titulara prava, veoma važan i sa aspekta zaštite kulturnog nasleđa marginalizovanih grupa u američkom društvu.

Rad ima za cilj da ukaže na sličnosti i razlike autorskog prava SAD i prava kontinentalnog pravnog sistema, kao što je pravo Republike Srbije, u pogledu uslova za zaštitu autorskih dela.

Reference

Abrams, H. B. 1992. Originality and Creativity in Copyright Law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 55(2), pp. 3-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1191773.

Ash, T. M. 2018. Where Are All the Orphans? How Effective Is Current Legislation in Enabling Cultural Heritage Institutions to Make Orphan Works Available Online?. PhD dissertation. London: University of London. Dostupno na: http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/M6127S.

Buccafusco, C. 2016. A Theory ofCopyright Authorship. Virginia Law Review, 102, pp. 1229-1295.

Cohen, J. E. 2007. Creativity and Culture in Copyright Theory. UC Davis School of Law Review, 40, pp. 1151-1205.

Dahlberg, B. 2011. The Orphan Works Problem: Preserving Access to the Cultural History of Disadvantaged Groups. Southern California Review of Law & Social Justice, 20(2), pp. 275-314.

Diligenski, A. & Prlja, D. 2017. Zaštita autorskih prava u digitalnom svetu. Strani pravni život, 61(1), pp. 35-49.

Goldstein, P. & Hugenholtz, B.P. 2010. International Copyright: Principles, Law, Practice. 2 ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Litman, J. & Samuelson, P. 2010. The Copyright Principles Project: Directions for Reform. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 25(3), pp. 1175-1245. Dostupno na: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/1381 (22. 11. 2020).

Lu, B. 2012. The Orphan Works Copyright Issue: Suggestions for International Response. Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 60, pp. 255-284.

Marković, S. 2014. Pravo intelektualne svojine i informaciono društvo. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Marković, S. & Popović, D. 2018. Pravo intelektualne svojine. 6. izdanje. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Patterson, R.L. & Lindberg, S.W. 1991. The Nature of Copyright: A Law of Users’ Right. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

Pink, W.S. 2018. Using and Protecting Copyrighted Works in an Online and Mobile Word. In: Einhorn, D.A. (ed.), Intellectual Property Law in Cyberspace. 3rd ed. Arlington, VA: AIPLA, American Intellectual Property Law Association: Bloomberg BNA, pp. 159-255.

Petrović, M. 2020. Pravna regulativa dela siročadi (orphan works) u Evropskoj uniji i Republici Srbiji. Pravo - teorija i praksa, 37(2), pp. 95-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2002095P.

Shaver, L. 2014. Copyright and Inequality. Washington University Law Review, 92, pp. 117-168.

Trotter, H. I., 1984. Six Copyright Theories for the Protection of Computer Object Programs. Arizona Law Review, 26, pp. 845-870. Dostupno na: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/647, (15. 11. 2020).

Walker, R.K. 2014. Negotiating the Unknown: A Compulsory Licensing Solution to the Orphan Works Problem. Cardozo Law Review, 35(3), pp. 983-1018. Dostupno na: https://www.copyright.gov/orphan/comments/Docket2012_12/Walker-Robert-Kirk.pdf, (20. 6. 2019).

Pravni izvori

Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, Paris Act of July 24, 1971, as amended on September 28, 1979. Dostupno na: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/treaties/en/berne/trt_berne_001en.pdf, (12. 10. 2020).

Compedium, 2017. Compedium of U.S. Copyrights Office Practices: Chapter 300 Copyrightable Autorship, revised 09/29/2017. Dostupno na: https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/chap300/ch300-copyrightable-authorship.pdf, (15. 11. 2020).

U.S.C., 1976. Copyrights Act [Zakon o autorskim pravima]. United States Code, 2020 Edition, Public. Law 116-193 (10/30/2020).

Title 17 - Copyrights. This title was enacted by act July 30, 1947, ch. 391, 61 Stat. 652, and was revised in its entirety by Public Law 94-553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2541. Tekst u redakciji iz 2020. godine dostupan na: https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml (10. 11. 2020).

Sudska praksa

Feist Publication, Inc. v. Rural telephone Service Co. 3, 499 U.S. 340, 111 S. Ct. 1282, 113. L. Ed. 2d 358, 1991 U.S. Dostupno na: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/ text/499/340, (15. 11. 2020).

FireSabre ConsultingLLC v. Sheehy, No. 11-CV-4719, (CS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 26, 2013). Dostupno na: https://casetext.com/case/firesabre-consulting-llc-v-sheehy, (15. 11. 2020).

Fred Fisher, Inc. v. Dillingahm, 298 F. 145, 151 (S.S.N.Y. 1924). Dostupno na: https://blogs.law.gwu.edu/mcir/case/fred-fisher-inc-v-dillingham/ (15. 11. 2020).

Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 81 F.2d 49, 54 (2d Cir. 1936). Dostupno na: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/81/49/1475281/, (17. 11. 2020).

Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman, 669 F.2d 852, 855, n. 4 (2d Cir.1982). Dostupno na: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/523/635/2298329/, (17. 11. 2020).

Objavljeno
2021-04-26
Sekcija
Pregledni naučni rad