EVOLUTIVNO TUMAČENJE S OSVRTOM NA RECENTNU PRAKSU EVROPSKOG SUDA ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA U KLIMATSKIM PREDMETIMA
Apstrakt
Evolutivno tumačenje jedno je od najvažnijih načela interpretacije koje je omogućilo Sudu da Konvenciju tumači u svjetlu današnjih uvjeta. Na takav način proširuje se opseg zaštite Konvencije, ali se istodobno otvara pitanje dopuštenih granica tumačenja. U recentnoj praksi Sud je utvrdio povredu Konvencije uslijed propusta odgovorne države da razvije i provede normativni okvir kojim bi se ublažile posljedice klimatskih promjena. U tim predmetima Sud je primijenio evolutivno tumačenje s obzirom na to da Konvencija ne jamči pravo na zdrav okoliš ili drugo slično pravo. Autori primjenom normativne i kazuističke metode ispituju je li Sud u svojoj recentnoj praksi u klimatskim predmetima dao jasnije kriterije za primjenu evolutivnog tumačenja. Rezultati istraživanja ukazuju da sudska praksa nije koherentna u pogledu ovih uvjeta pa su granice evolutivnog potencijala Konvencije ostale nejasne.
Reference
References
Bureš, P. 2017. Human dignity: an illusory limit for the evolutive interpretation of the ECHR?. Amicus Curiae, 110, pp. 20-28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v2017i110.5035 (6. 7. 2024)
Djeffal, C. 2016. Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316339558
Dothan, S. 2019. The Three Traditional Approaches to Treaty Interpretation: A Current Application to the European Court of Human Rights. Fordham International Law Journal, 42(3), pp. 765-794. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3241331 (3. 5. 2024).
Dzehtsiarou, K. 2011. European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights, German Law Journal, 12(10), pp. 1730-1745. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1951371 (2. 5. 2024). https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200017533
Đajić, S. V. 2019. Mehanizmi defragmentacije međunarodnog prava: sistemsko tumačenje, evolutivno tumačenje i sudski aktivizam Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 53(2), pp. 363-375. Available at: https://scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=0550-21791902363Q (3. 5. 2024). https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns53-23515
Etinski, R. 2022. Evolutive Interpretation of Treaties and Risk of Judicial Legislation. Studia Iuridica Montenegrina, 4(2), pp. 7-31. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/journal-detail?id=2718 (5. 5. 2024).
Greer, S. 2006. The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494963
Greer, S. 2010. The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Universal Principle or Margin of Appreciation?. Available at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/human-rights/sites/human-rights/files/greer.pdf (2. 5. 2024).
Hadži Stević, B. 2021. Opravdanost ustavnosudskog aktivizmа zarad zaštite ljudskih prava: Evropski sud za ljudska prava i Ustavni sud Bosne i Hercegovine, Eudaimonia: revija za pravnu, političku i socijalnu teoriju i filozofiju, 5(1), pp. 63-86. Available at: http://epub.ius.bg.ac.rs/index.php/eudaimonia/issue/view/8 (3. 5. 2024). https://doi.org/10.51204/IVRS_21103A
Hariri, R. 2022. Zaštita ljudskih prava u okviru Vijeća Europe. Diplomski rad. Zagreb: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
Helgesen, J. E. 2011. Dialogue between judges 2011. Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Dialogue_between_judges_2011 (5. 5. 2024).
Letsas, G. 2012. The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and its Legitimacy. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2021836 (3. 5. 2024).
Lubura, M. 2021. Pravo na abortus u savremenom pravu i praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Strani pravni život, 65(1), pp. 159-170. Available at: https://doi.org.10.5937/spz65-28264 (9. 5. 2024).
Marochini, M. 2014. The interpretation of the European Convention Human Rights, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 51(1), pp. 63-84. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/116319 (4. 5. 2024).
Marochini Zrinski, M. 2018. Izazovi u primjeni i tumačenju Konvencije u Republici Hrvatskoj. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 55(2), pp. 423-446. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/293135 (1. 5. 2024). https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2018.55.128.423
Mihelčić, G. & Marochini Zrinski, M. 2018. Utjecaj konvencijskih načela tumačenja na pojedine građanskopravne institute (odabrana pitanja), Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 57(78), pp. 127-147. Available at: https://scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=0350-85011878127M (2. 5. 2024). https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfni1878127M
Omejec, J. 2014. Konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda u praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava: Strasbourški acquis. 2. dopunjeno izdanje. Zagreb: Novi informator.
Schabas, W. A. 2015. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199594061.001.0001
Sicilianos, L. A. 2020. Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Remarks on the Court’s Approach. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cahdi/the-contribution-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-to-the-development-of-public-international-law (3. 5. 2024).
Sonnleitner, L. 2022. A Constitutionalist Approach to the European Convention on Human Rights: The Legitimacy of Evolutive and Static Interpretation. Oxford: Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509946907
Tintor, Lj. 2021. Značaj sluačaja Urgenda za razvoj klimatskih parnica na području Evrope. Strani pravni život, 65(2), pp. 249-265. Available at: https://doi.org10.5937/spz65-31054 (9. 5. 2024).
Tulkens, F. 2011. Dialogue between judges 2011. Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Dialogue_between_judges_2011 (5. 5. 2024).
Legal Sources
Konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda, 1950, Vijeće Europe. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Convention_hrv (3. 5. 2024).
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 1155, p. 331. Available at: https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf (3. 5. 2024).
Case law
A, B and C v Ireland, Application no. 25579/05, Judgment ECHR, 16 December 2010.
Bayatyan v Armenia, Application no. 23459/03, Judgment ECHR, 7 July 2011.
Carême v France, Application no. 7189/21, Decision ECHR, 9 April 2024.
Christine Goodwin v The United Kingdom, Application no. 28957/95, Judgment ECHR, 11 July 2002.
Duarte Agostinho and Others v Portugal and 32 Others, Application no. 39371/20, Decision ECHR, 9 April 2024.
Dudgeon v The United Kingdom, Application no. 7525/76, Judgment ECHR, 22 October 1981.
I v The United Kingdom, Application no. 25680/94, Judgment ECHR, 11 July 2002.
Johnston and Others v Ireland, Application no. 9697/82, Judgment 18 December 1986.
Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v Hungary, Application no. 18030/11, Judgment ECHR, 8 November 2016.
Marckx v Belgium, Application no. 6833/74, Judgment ECHR, 13 June 1979.
Muñoz Díaz v. Spain, Application no. 49151/07, Judgment ECHR, 8 December 2009.
Pretty v The United Kingdom, Application no. 2346/02, Judgment ECHR, 29 April 2002.
Sheffield and Horsham v The United Kingdom, Application nos. 22985/93 23390/94, Judgment ECHR, 30 July 1998.
Soering v The United Kingdom, Application no. 14038/88, Judgment ECHR, 7 July 1989.
Tyrer v The United Kingdom, Application no. 5856/72, Judgment ECHR, 25 April 1978.
Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland, Application no. 53600/20, Judgment ECHR, 9 April 2024.
X and Others v Austria, Application no. 19010/07, Judgment ECHR, 19 February 2013.
