UTICAJ BREXITA NA NADLEŽNOST, PRIZNANJE I IZVRŠENJE SUDSKIH ODLUKA U GRAĐANSKIM I TRGOVAČKIM STVARIMA

Ključne reči: Brexit, nadležnost, priznanje i izvršenje, Evropska unija, Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo

Apstrakt

U radu se analizira uticaj Brexita na nadležnost, priznanje i izvršenje sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima u pravu Evopske unije i Ujedinjenog Kraljevstva Velike Britanije i Sjeverne Irske. Nakon što Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo napusti Evropsku uniju, prestat će se primjenjivati pravo Evropske unije u Ujedinjenom Kraljevstvu i imat će status države nečlanice. Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo će napustiti sistem civilne pravosudne saradnje koji postoji između država članica Evropske unije i Ujedinjenog Kraljevstva. Sada nije poznato na koji način će se urediti odnosi između Evropske unije i Ujedinjenog Kraljevstva za sistem civilne pravosudne saradnje. Najbolje rješenje bi bilo da se zaključi poseban sporazum kojim će se urediti nadležnost, priznanje i izvršenje sudskih odluka. Ukoliko se ne postigne sporazum, primjenjivat će se međunarodne konvencije koje su trenutno na snazi, što neće biti odgovarajući pravni okvir za pravnu saradnju u skladu sa potrebama tržišta. Pravne posljedice Brexita imat će i Evropska unija, a ne samo Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo.

Reference

Coleman, M. 2017. Brexit and Human Rights - An Opportunity? In: Smyth, C.-M., Lang, R. (eds.), The Future of Human Rights in the UK. Cambridge Scholars, pp. 92-110.

Council of the Notariats of the European Union 2008. Comparative Study on Authentic Instruments - National Provisions of Private Law, Circulation, Mutual Recognition and Enforcement, Possible Legislative Initiative by the European Union (United Kingdom, France, Germany, Poland, Romania, Sweden). Brussels: European Parliament.

Davies, K. & Kirsey, V. 2016. Anti-Suit Injunctions in Support of London Seated Arbitrations Post-Brexit: Are All Things New Just Well-Forgotten Past? Journal of International Arbitration, 33(7), pp. 501-519.

Dickinson, A. 2016. Back to the future: the UK’s EU exit and the conflict of laws. Journal of Private International Law, 3, pp. 195-210.

Eeckhout, P. & Frantziou, E. 2017. Brexit and article 50 TEU: A constitutionalist reading. Common Market Law Review, 54 (3), pp. 695-733.

Endicott, T. 2018. Administrative Law, 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fahey, E. 2018. Introduction to Law and Global Governance. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Jones, A. 2017. Brexit: Implications for UK Competition Law. King’s College London Dickson Poon School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series 21/2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2923725.

Lang, A. 2014. The consequences of Brexit: some complications from international law. LSE Law Policy Briefing Series (3). The London School of Economics and Political Science: London.

Lehmann, M. & Zetzsche, D. 2016. Brexit and the Consequences for Commercial and Financial Relations between the EU and the UK. European Business Law Review, 27(7), pp. 999-1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2841333.

Mukarrum, A. 2016. Brexit and English Jurisdiction Agreements: The Post-Referendum Legal Landscape. European Business Law Review, 27(7), pp. 989-998.

Ratković, T. & Zgrabljić Rotar, D. 2013. Choice-of-Court Agreements under the Brussels I Regulation (Recast). Journal of Private International Law, 9(2), pp. 245-268. https://doi.org/10.5235/17441048.9.2.245.

Schütze, R. 2018. European Union Law, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stanivuković, M. 2012. Haška konvencija o izboru nadležnog suda – kritička procena. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 46(3), pp. 121-140.

Van Hooft, A. 2016. Brexit and the Future of Intellectual Property Litigation and Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, Special edition, 33(7), pp. 541-564.

Internet izvori

Arnorsson, A. & Zoega, G. 2016. On the Causes of Brexit (August 23, 2016). CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6056. Dostupno na: SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2851396 (19. 2. 2019.)

Baudenbacher, C. 2017. How the EFTA Court works – and why it is an option for post-Brexit Britain. The London School of Economics and Political Science, Brexit, from 25. 8. 2017. Dostupno na: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2017/08/25/how-the-efta-court-works-and-why-it-is-an-option-for-post-brexit-britain/ (8. 2. 2019).

Böckli, P., Davies, P.L., Ferran, E., Ferrarini, G., Garrido Garcia, J.M., Hopt, K.L., Opalski, A., Pietrancosta, A., Roth, M., Skog, R., Soltysinski, S., Winter, J.W., Winner, M., Wymeersch, E. 2017. The consequences of Brexit for companies and company law. English & Commonwealth Law eJournal 22(2). March, 2017. Dostupno na: https://europeancompanylawexperts.wordpress.com/publications/brexit-and-company-law/ (12.1.2019)

Douglas-Scott, S. 2016. Brexit, Article 50 and the Contested British Constitution. Modern Law Review, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2846530, (19. 2. 2019), 18. Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 241/2016. Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2846530 (19.02.2019).

Lock, T. & Daly, T. G. (eds.), 2016. Brexit and the British Bill of Rights. Edinburgh This research paper originated in a workshop held at Edinburgh Law School on 27 October 2016. Dostupno na: https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/11601084/Brexit+and+British+Bill+of+Rights+Report+%28SSRN%29.pdf (19.2.1019).

Lords Library notes, 2018. Dostupno na: http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/LLN-2018-0135/LLN-2018-0135.pdf, (20.2.2019).

Rühl, G. 2010. Choice of Law and Choice of Forum in the European Union. Recent Developments. In: Hodges, C. & Vogenauer, S. (eds.), Civil Justice Systems in Europe. Implications for Choice of Forum and Choice of Contract Law (pp. i.E.-i.E.). Oxford: Hart Publishing. Dostupno na: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1604615&rec=1&srcabs=1752116& alg=1&pos=3, (10.2.2019).

Pravni izvori

Brussels Convention 72/454/EEZ. Konvencija o nadležnosti i izvršenju sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima (potpisana 27. 9. 1968.), OJ L 299, 31.12.1972, pp. 32–42. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A41968A0927%2801%29.

Konvencija o nadležnosti te priznavanju i izvršenju sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima. OJ L 339, 21.12.2007, p. 3–41. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A22007A1221%2803%29.

Konvencija o nadležnosti i priznavanju te izvršavanju sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima [Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters], OJ L 147, 10.6.2009, p. 5–43. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2009.147.01.0005.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2009:147:FULL.

Lugano Convention 88/592/EEC. Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Done at Lugano on 16 September 1988. [Konvencija o sudskoj nadležnosti i izvršenju sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima], OJ L 319, 25.11.1988, p. 9–48. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A41988A0592.

94/1/EC, ECSC: Decision of the Council and the Commission of 13 December 1993 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the European Economic Area between the European Communities, their Member States and the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland, the Republic of Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Swiss Confederation, OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 1–1.

Uredba (EU) br. 1215/2012 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 12. prosinca 2012. o nadležnosti, priznavanju i izvršenju sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima, OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1–32. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32012R1215.

Uredba Vijeća (EZ) broj 44/2001 od 22. 12. 2000. godine o nadležnosti, priznanju i izvršenju sudskih odluka u građanskim i trgovačkim stvarima, OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1–23. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32001R0044.

Policy Paper: Future Partnership in EU-UK, 2017. Government of the UK, Providing a cross-border civil judicial cooperation framework - a future partnership. Dostupno na: https://www.gov.uk/publications/providing-across-border-civil-judicial-cooperation-framework-a-future-partnership-paper.

Withdrawai Act, 2018. Withdrawai Agreement Section 13(1) (c) of the European Union. House of Lords. LLN-2019-135.
Objavljeno
2019-07-10
Sekcija
Pregledni naučni rad