LOCUS STANDI PRED UPRAVNIM SUDOVIMA U STVARIMA OD ZNAČAJA ZA ŽIVOTNU SREDINU – EVROPSKA PERSPEKTIVA
Apstrakt
Glavni cilj ovog članka je da ispita u kojoj meri građani i njihova udruženja kao strane u sudskim postupcima mogu da zaštite životnu sredinu u zemljama Evropske unije i Srbiji, kao i da se identifikuju glavni trendovi i ograničenja za pristup pravnoj zaštiti u evropskim pravnim sistemima. Takođe, cilj ovog rada je da se, nakon analize tri dominantna pristupa uređenju prava na pokretanje upravnog spora u evropskim zemljama, utvrdi u kojoj meri se pravo Srbije uklapa u navedene sisteme. Naučni metodi korišćeni za ovaj članak su normativno-dogmatski metod i uporedni metod prava, kako bi se analiziralo zakonodavstvo i praksa u evropskim zemljama u vezi sa pravom javnosti da zaštiti životnu sredinu u upravnom sporu. Stoga, članak se fokusira na analizu relevantnog međunarodnog i nacionalnog zakonodavstva i na njegovu primenu. Ključno pitanje za ostvarivanje prava javnosti da pokrene upravni spor, kako bi zaštitila pravo na zdravu životnu sredinu i svoje pravo na učešće u donošenju ekoloških odluka, jeste način na koji je formulisan locus standi. Pristup upravnom sudu u ekološkim stvarima uglavnom podrazumeva aktivnu legitimaciju organizacija civilnog društva koje se bave zaštitom životne sredine (zainteresovane javnosti) za pokretanje upravnog spora, mada u nekim slučajevima i građani (javnost) mogu imati aktivnu legitimaciju.
Reference
Aragão, A. 2013. Study on the Implementation of Articles 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in Portugal. Brussels: European Commission.
Aragão, A. 2019. Environmental Standards in the Portuguese Constitution. In: Turner, S. et al. (eds.). Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612500.011
Cane, P. 2016. Controlling Administrative Power - An Historical Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316550878
Chevalier, E. & Eliantonio, M. 2017. Standing before French Administrative Courts: Too Restrictive to Effectively Enforce Environmental Rights?. Montesquieu Law Review,5, pp. 65-74.
Darpö, J. 2009. Environmental Justice through Environmental Courts? Lessons Learned from the Swedish Experience. In: Ebbesson, J. & Okowa, P. (eds.). Environmental Law and Justice in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 176-194. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576027.010
Darpö, J. 2013. Effective Justice? Synthesis report of the study on the Implementation of Articles 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in the Member States of the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.
Darpö, J. 2015. Access to Justice in Environmental Decision-making in Sweden: Standing for the public concerned, the scope of review on appeal and costs. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Drenovak-Ivanović M. 2014. Pristup pravdi u ekološkim upravnim stvarima. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Eliantonio, M. et al. 2012. Standing Up for Your Right(s) in Europe, A Comparative Study on Legal Standing (Locus Standi) before the EU and Member States’ Courts. Strasbourg: European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs.
Etinski, R. 2013. Neposredna primena člana 9, stava 3 Arhuske konvencije u pravnom poretku Republike Srbije. Strani pravni život, 3, pp. 23-44.
European Commission, The Environmental Implementation Review. 2019. Country Report – Latvia. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52019SC0124R(01) (29. 10. 2023).
Foulon, J. 2019. Recent Developments in French Environmental Law: Recognition and Implementation of Ecological Damage in French Tort Law. Environmental Law Review, 21(4), pp. 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452919883441
Jerinić, J. 2020. U ime javnosti: legitimacija zastupnika kolektivnih interesa i širih interesa javnosti u upravnim stvarima. Pravni zapisi, 2, pp. 504-531. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-29648
Justice and Environment Network. 2010. Report on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters.
Karageorgou, V. 2018. The Scope of The Review in Environment-Related Disputes in the Light of the Aarhus Convention and EU Law - Tensions between Effective Judicial Protection and National Procedural Autonomy Procedural Environmental Rights. In: Jendrośka, J. & Bar, M. (eds.). Procedural Environmental Rights: Principle X In Theory And Practice, European Environmental Law Forum Series Vol. 4. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 229-260. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780686998.014
Lees, E. 2019. Adjudication Systems. In: Lees, E. & Viñuales J. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198790952.001.0001
Lilić, S. 2014. Upravno pravo i upravno procesno parvo. Osmo izdanje. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Lončar, Z. 2015. Zastupanje stranaka u upravnom sporu. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 4, pp. 1694-1711.
Makowiak, J. 2016. Study on Factual Aspects of Access to Justice in Relation to EU Environmental Law – France. Maître de conferences en droit Université de Limoges. Crideau.
Mikosa, Ž. 2018. Implementation of the Aarhus Convention through Actio Popularis - Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention and Actio Popularis. In: Jendrośka, J. & Bar, M. (eds.). Procedural Environmental Rights: Principle X in Theory and Practice, European Environmental Law Forum Series, Vol. 4. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780686998.015
Milieu Ltd. 2007a. Summary Report on the Inventory of EU Member States’ Measures on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. Brussels: European Commission.
Milieu Ltd. 2007b. Measures on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Article 9(3)): Report for Portugal. Brussels: European Commission.
Milieu Ltd. 2019. Study on EU Implementation of the Aarhus Convention in the Area of Access to Justice in Environmental Matters - Final Report. Brussels: European Commission.
Milkov, D. 2013. Upravno pravo III: Kontrola uprave. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.
Nesbit, M., Lucha, C. & Stec, S. 2019. Development of an assessment framework on environmental governance in the EU Member States, Final Report. Brussels: European Commission.
Palmer, A. & Robb, C. 2014. International Environmental Law in National Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rakić-Vodinelić, V. 1989. Ekološka tužba: član 156. Zakona o obligacionim odnosima. Pravni život, 4/5, pp. 878-884.
Rehbinder, E. 2009. Germany in Comparative Perspective. In: Kotzé, L., Paterson, A. (eds.). The Role of the Judiciary in Environmental Governance: Comparative Perspectives. Holland: Wolters Kluwer.
Rodina, A. 2022. Interaction of Sustainability and Environment in the Case Law of the Latvian Constitutional Court, Strani pravni život, 66(4), pp. 411-429. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_22404KJ
Sadeleer, N. de, Roller, G. & Dross, M. 2002. Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, Final Report prepared for the European Commission, ENV.A.3/ETU/2002/0030.
Tomić, Lj. 2023. Ekološko-pravni aspekti novog nemačkog zakona o korporativnoj dužnosti pažnje u lancima snabdevanja – ispitivanje dejstva na pravne subjekte u Republici Srbiji, Strani pravni život, 67(2), pp. 211-227. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_23203KJ
Internet Sources
Lavrysen, L. 2021. The French Climate Cases: Legal Basis and Broader Meaning. Gland: IUCN. Available at: https://www.iucn.org/news/world-commission-environmental-law/202102/french-climate-cases-legal-basis-and-broader-meaning (5. 10. 2023.).
Legal Sources
Basic Law of Macao Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China 1999. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b53a0.html (11. 9. 2023).
Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil 1988, with last amendments in 2017. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4c4820bf2.html (11. 9. 2023).
Constitution of the Republic of Angola 2010. Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Angola_2010 (11. 9. 2023).
Constitution of the Republic of Cape Verde 1980, with last amendments in 1992. Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Cape_Verde_1992 (11. 9. 2023).
Constitution of the Republic of Mozambique 2004, with last amendments in 2007. Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Mozambique_2007 (11. 9. 2023).
Constitution of the Republic of Portugal 2005. 7th revision. Available at: https://www.parlamento.pt/sites/EN/Parliament/Documents/Constitution7th.pdf (11. 9. 2023).
Code Civil 1804. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006070721/ (11. 9. 2023).
Latvian Environmental Protection Law 2013. LVA-2013-L-98117. Available at: https://wwwex.ilo.org/dyn/natlex2/natlex2/files/download/98117/Environmental_Protection_Law.pdf (11. 9. 2023).
Law on Administrative Disputes [ZUS], Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 111/2009.
Law on Environmental Impact Assessment, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 135/2004 and 36/2009.
Law on Environmental Protection, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 135/2004, 36/2009, 36/2009, 72/2009, 43/2011, 14/2016, 76/2018, 95/2018 and 95/2018.
Law on General Administrative Procedure [ZUP], Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 18/2016, 95/2018 and 2/2023.
Law on Integrated Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 135/2004, 25/2015 and 109/2021.
Law on Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 135/2004 and 88/2010.
Loi N. 2016-1087 pour la reconquête de la biodiversité, de la nature et des paysages 2016. France.
Umwelt-Rechtsbehelfsgesetz 2006. N. 58. Available at: https://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?startbk=Bundesanzeiger_BGBl&jumpTo=bgbl106s2816.pdf#__bgbl__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27bgbl106s2816.pdf%27%5D__1590443284109 (11. 9. 2023).
Case Law
Decision of the Administrative Court of the Republic of Serbia of 12. 2. 2021, No. 6063/19.
Decision of the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure of the Republic of Serbia of 1 April 2019, No. 351-02-00063/2019-07, ROP-MSGI-1317-CPI-2/2019 of 1. 4. 2019.
Supreme Administrative Court of Swede Stora Billerud (Sweden); RÅ 1997 ref 38. Available at: www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/pp/a.to.j/Jurisprudence_prj/SWEDEN/SE_RA_1997ref38_Stora_Billerud/Sweden_1997_Stora_Billerud.pdf (23. 9. 2023).
Supremo Tribunal Administrativo da República Portuguesa 2016, No. 1362/12.
Tribunal Administratif de Paris 2021, No. 1904967, 1904968, 1904972, 1904976/4-1. Available at: http://paris.tribunal-administratif.fr/content/download/179360/1759761/version/1/file/1904967190496819049721904976.pdf (5. 10. 2023).
