FORMULATING AGENCIES – WORKING METHODS AND COOPERATION BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY SUBJECTS OF HARMONIZATION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW

Main Article Content

Marija Mijatović, PhD

Abstract

Institutions in the form of so called formulating agencies have greatly contributed to the harmonization of international trade law. Their efforts in fnding common principles in different national trade laws are all in the service of providing international trade flow, increased law certainty and prevention of legal disputes. To achieve those goals, formulating agencies use different normative methods, both traditional (hard law) and alternative (soft law) sources. However, imprecise allocation of jurisdiction between these international organisations leads to unreasonable wastage of intellectual and fnancial capacities, but also to a serious problem of doubling legal acts with purpose of regulating the same questions at the international level. Influence of formulating agencies on modern normative processes is steadily growing, yet still there are steps to be taken in terms of clear coordination and separation of their activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Review scientific papers

References

Abbott, K., Snidal, D., „Hard and Soft Law in International Governance“, International Organization 3/2000.

Bonell, M. J., “Towards a Legislative Codifcation of the UNIDROIT Principles”, Uniform Law Review 233/2007.

Chan, J. W. T., „Allocation of Work Among Formulating Agencies“, Modern Law for Global Commerce, UNCITRAL, Vienna 2011, 33, https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/congress/09-83930_Ebook.pdf, 12.01.2018.

Đurđev, D., „Doprinos Ujedinjenih nacija unifkaciji pravila međunarodnog privrednog prava“, Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine-Časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu 10/1995.

Fišer Šobot, S., Pravo međunarodne prodaje, Novi Sad 2014.

Guzman, A., T. Meyer, „International soft law“, Journal of Legal Analysis 1/2010

Kronke, H., “Methodical Freedom and Organizational Constraints in the Development of Transnational Commercial Law”, Loyola Law Review 51/2005.

Meyer, L., „Soft Law for Solid Contracts? A Comparative Analysis of the Value of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and the Principles of European Contract Law to the Process of Contract Law Harmonization“, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 9/2006.

Nikolić, D., Uvod u sistem građanskog prava, Novi Sad 2008.

Schermers, H., Blokker, N., International Institutional Law, Leiden 2011.

Schmitthoff, C., Commercial Law in Changing Economic Climate, London 1981.

Spasić, I., „UNIDROIT - Doprinos unifkaciji nekih od najvažnijih pitanja međunarodnog trgovinskog prava“, Strani pravni život 2/2009.

Stanivuković, M., „Instrumenti harmonizacije i unifkacije prava i njihov odnos prema kolizionim normama, s posebnim osvrtom na Načela evropskog ugovornog prava“, u: Načela evropskog ugovornog prava i jugoslovensko pravo–prilog harmonizaciji domaćeg zakonodavstva (ur. R. Vukadinović), Kragujevac 2001.

Vilus, J. et.al., Međunarodno privredno pravo, Novi Sad 2012.

Vogenauer, S., “Sources of Law and Legal Method in Comparative Law”, in: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (ed. M. Reimann, R. Zimmermann), Oxford 2006.

Vukadinović, R., Međunarodno poslovno pravo-opšti deo, Kragujevac 2012.