OSNOVNI ASPEKTI PRAVA POVLAČENJA (DRAG ALONG) I PRAVA PRIDRUŽIVANJA (TAG ALONG)

Ključne reči: korporativno upravljanje, drugi agencijski problem, drag along i tag along, pravo povlačenja, pravo pridruživanja

Apstrakt

U radu se analiziraju prava članova zatvorenih društava nastala u common law pravnim sistemima – drag along i tag along prava. S obzirom na to da predstavljaju vrstu efikasnog sredstva prevencije za rešavanje drugog agencijskog problema korporativnog upravljanja, koji se odnosi na sukob interesa između većinskog i manjinskog člana, kao i za rešavanje sukoba između članova do kojih može da dođe prilikom prodaje udela društva, ova prava su počela da se primenjuju i u državama koje pripadaju evropskokontinentalnom pravnom sistemu. Poslednjih godina drag along i tag along prava dobijaju na aktuelnosti i u domaćoj praksi, imajući u vidu da se sve učestalije ugovaraju između članova domaćih društava. Zbog toga je važno razumeti svrhu njihovog ugovaranja i interese koji se njima štite. Stoga je cilj ovog rada da objasni pojam i svrhu drag along i tag along prava.

Reference

Agstner, P. 2019. Shareholder Conflicts in Close Corporations Between Theory and Practice: Evidence from Italian Private Limited Liability Companies.

European Business Organization Law Review, 21(3), pp. 505-543.

Armour, J., Hansmann, H. & Kraakman, R. 2017. Agency Problems and Legal Strategies. In: Kraakman, R. et al. (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law. A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bienz, C. & Walz, U. 2010. Venture Capital Exit Rights. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19(4), pp. 1071-1114.

Blair, M. M. & Stout, L. A. 2001. Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Behavioral Foundations of Corporate Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149, pp. 1735-1810.

Cools, S. 2019. The Validity and Enforceability of Tag Along and Drag Along Clauses: A Comparative Analysis, pp. 1-14. Dostupno na: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3334843 (19. 7. 2021).

D’Cruz, R. 2014. Disputes Arising from Shareholder Agreements. In: Poulton, E. (ed.), Arbitration of M&A Transactions: A Practical Global Guide. 1st ed. Globe Law and Business, pp. 411-422.

Dell’Antonia, M. 2016. Finalità economiche e descrizione giuridica delle clausole di covendita. In: Rufini, D. (ed.), Le clausule di covendita. Associazione degli Studi Legali Associati, pp. 5-12.

Divizia, P. 2013. Clausole statutarie di covendita e trascinamento. Wolters Kluwer Italia, p. IX.

Dyck, A. & Zingales, L. 2004. Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison. The Journal of Finance, 59(2), pp. 537-600.

Easterbrook, F. H. & Fischel, D. R. 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Harvard University Press.

Gagula, A. 2017. Ugovorno uređenje odnosa osnivača u društvu sa ograničenom odgovornošću. Anali Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Zenici, 10 (20), pp. 8-28.

Ghingher, J. J. 1975. Shareholders’ Agreements for Closely Held Corporations: Special Tools for Special Circumstances. University of Baltimore Law Review, 4(2), pp. 211-244.

Hewitt, I. 2001. Joint Ventures. 2nd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwel.

Jovanović, N., Radović, V. & Radović, M. 2020. Kompanijsko pravo – Pravo privrednih subjekata. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Jovanović, N. 2009. Berzansko pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Mock, S., Csach, K. & Havel, B. 2018. Shareholders’ Agreements Between Corporate and Contract Law. In: Mock, S., Csach, K. & Havel, B. (eds.), International Handbook on Shareholders’ Agreements. 1st ed. De Gruyter, pp. 3-46.

Penguin Group. 2007. The Penguin English Dictionary. 3rd ed.

Radović, V. 2008. Uticaj agencijskih problema na pravo akcionarskih društava i korporativno upravljanje. U: Vasiljević, M. & Radović, V. (ur.), Korporativno upravljanje – zbornik radova. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, pp. 235-265.

Radović, V. 2007. Mere odbrane akcionarskog društva od preuzimanja kontrole. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Radović, V. 2004. Obavezna javna ponuda za kupovinu akcija ciljne kompanije. Pravni život, 53(11), pp. 103-126.

Rufini, D. 2016. Le clausole di covendita: profili civilistici. In: Rufini, D. (ed.), Le clausule di covendita. Associazione degli Studi Legali Associati, pp. 13-29.

Sáez Lacave, I. & Bermejo Gutiérrez, N. 2010. Specific Investments, Opportunism and Corporate Contracts: A Theory of Tag-along and Drag-along Clauses. European Business Organization Law Review, 11(3), pp. 423-458.

Sasso, L. 2011. Corporate Governance and the Role of Hybrid Financial Instruments in the UK and US. Corporate Finance and Capital Markets Law Review, pp. 1-13. Dostupno na: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfmabstract_id=1934276 (19. 7. 2021).

Van der Elst, C. & Van den Steen, L. 2009. Balancing the Interests of Minority and

Majority Shareholders: A Comparative Analysis of Squeeze-out and Sell-out

Rights. European Company and Financial Law Review, 6(4), pp. 391-439.

Vasiljević, M. 2013. Korporativno upravljanje – Izabrane teme. Beograd: Udruženje pravnika u privredi Republike Srbije.

Pravni izvori

Zakon o preuzimanju akcionarskih društava. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 46/2006, 107/2009, 99/2011, 108/2016.

Zakon o privrednim društvima. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 36/2011, 99/2011, 83/2014 - dr. zakon, 5/2015, 44/2018, 95/2018, 91/2019.

Sudska praksa

Manti Holdings, LLC v Authentix Acquisition Co., Inc., Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, No. 354, 2020, 2021 WL 4165159, 13. 9. 2021. Dostupno na: https://casetext.com/case/manti-holdings-llc-v-authentixacquisitionco (27. 11. 2021).

Cunningham v Resourceful Land Limited and others, High Court of Justice, EWHC 1185 (Ch), 2. 5. 2018. Dostupno na: https://www.lexiswebinars.co.uk/legal/corporate-law/the-latest-corporate-law-cases-2019/supporting-materials/Cunningham-v-Resourceful-Land-2018.PDF (15. 7. 2021).

Halpin v Riverstone Nat’l, Inc., Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. 9796-VCG, 26. 2. 2015. Dostupno na: https://casetext.com/case/halpinv-riverstone-natl-inc (18. 7. 2021).

Minnesota Invco v Midwest Wireless, Court of Chancery of Delaware, No. 903 A.2d 786, 7. 6. 2006. Dostupno na: https://casetext.com/case/minnesota-invco-v-midwest-wireless (27. 11. 2021).

Objavljeno
2022-05-09
Sekcija
Pregledni naučni rad