Zaštita autorskih prava u eri generativne veštačke inteligencije: predmet Disney i Universal protiv Midjourney
Bočna strana članka
Glavni sadržaj članka
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0208-2807
Apstrakt
Dana 11. juna 2025. godine, Disney i Universal studio podneli su tužbu protiv kompanije za veštačku inteligenciju (VI) Midjourney zbog kršenja autorskih prava. Ovo je prva tužba jedne velike holivudske kompanije protiv kompanije za veštačku inteligenciju i mogla bi da postane važan presedan za regulisanje generativne VI. Imajući to u vidu, autor će pokušati da ispita pravni problem generativne VI i njegove posledice po zaštitu autorskih prava. Rad predstavlja uporednu studiju prava SAD i Evropske unije u vezi sa problemom generativne VI i nudi moguća rešenja ovog problema, imajući u vidu razlike u pomenutim pravnim tradicijama. Primenom pravnog dogmatskog metoda, uporednopravnog metoda, studije slučaja, analitičkog i sintetičkog metoda, autor će pokušati da nađe univerzalno rešenje za globalni problem generativne VI, koji je sada aktuelizovan ovim i mnogim drugim slučajevima.
Preuzimanja
Detalji članka
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Reference
Apoorva. V. 2023. The copyright problem with emerging generative AI. Journal of Intellectual Property Studies, 7(2), pp. 69-84.
Avramović, D. S. & Jovanov, I. D. 2023. Sudijska (ne)pristrasnost i veštačka inteligencija. Strani pravni život, 67(2), pp. 161-177. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_23201KJ
Bottis, M., Papadopoulos, M., Zampakolas, C. & Ganatsiou, P. 2019. Text and Data Mining in the EU ‘Acquis Communautaire’ Tinkering with TDM & Digital Legal Deposit. Erasmus Law Review, 12(2), pp. 190-208. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000140
Chen, S. & O’Brien, M. 2025. Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement. Available at: https://apnews.com/article/disney-universal-midjourney-copyright-lawsuit-722b1b892192e7e1628f7ae5da8cc427, 11. 6. 2025.
Chmielewski, D. 2025. Disney, Universal sue image creator Midjourney for copyright infringement. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/disney-universal-sue-image-creator-midjourney-copyright-infringement-2025-06-11/, 11. 6. 2025.
Chow, A. R. 2025. How the Disney-Midjourney Lawsuit Could Reshape the Battle Over AI and Copyright. Available at: https://time.com/7293362/disney-universal-midjourney-lawsuit-ai/, 11. 6. 2025.
Culliton, B. M. 2024. The generative AI pirate? The intersection of copyrights and generative AI in literary works. Cybaris: An Intellectual Property Law Review, 15(3), pp. 251-283. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003260127-2
Cyphert, A. B. 2024. Generative AI, plagiarism, and copyright infringement in legal. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 25 (Symposium issue), pp. 49-66. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4938701
Dermawan, A. 2023. Text and data mining exceptions in the development of generative AI models: What the EU Member States could learn from the Japanese “nonenjoyment” purposes?. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 27, pp. 44-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12285
Dornis, T. 2025. The Training of Generative AI Is Not Text and Data Mining. European Intellectual Property Review, 47(2), pp. 65-78.
Duffy, C. 2025. Disney and Universal team up to sue AI photo generator Midjourney, claiming copyright infringement. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/11/tech/disney-universal-midjourney-ai-copyright-lawsuit , 11. 6. 2025.
Dusollier, S. et al. 2025. Copyright and Generative Al: Opinion. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 16(1), pp. 121-127.
Dutta, M. 2025. The Legal Landscape of Copyright in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 7(2), pp. 7768-7782.
European Commission, Directorate General for Communication,.2022. Study on copyright and new technologies: copyright data management and artificial intelligence. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.
Garon, J. 2023. The Revolution will be Digitized: Generative AI, Synthetic Media, and the Medium of Disruption. Ohio State Technology Law Journal, 20(1), pp. 139-223.
Gendron, V. 2024. A New Frontier: The Music Industry’s Struggle against Generative AI. University of Miami Business Law Review, 33(1), pp. 161-192.
Guadamuz, A. & Cabell, D. 2014. Data Mining in UK Higher Education Institutions: Law and Policy. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 4(1), pp. 3-29. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2014.01.01
Henderson, P. Li, X., Jurafsky, D., Hashimoto, T., Lemley, M. A. & Liang, P. 2023. Foundation Models and Fair Use. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(1), pp. 1-76. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404340
Ivanović, S. 2021. Autorskopravo i pretraživanje teksta i podataka. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 60(92), pp. 59-78. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn0-34357
Knibbs, K. 2025. Disney and Universal Sue AI Company Midjourney for Copyright Infringement. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/disney-universal-sue-midjourney/, 11. 6. 2025.
Kollár, P. 2022. Mind if I Mine? A Study on the Justification and Sufficiency of Text and Data Mining Exceptions in the European Union. SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-44. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3960570
Kuker, H. 2024. Inspiration Versus Infringement: Why The Right to Use Copyrighted Images for Referential Purposes by AI Should Not Be Held To Higher or Different Standards Currently in Effect. SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4727896
LaPorta, L. 2024. Authorless AI: navigating copyright challenges of generative. Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, 11(1), pp. 64-88.
Lin, P. K. 2024. Retrofitting Fair Use: Art & Generative AI after Warhol. Santa Clara Law Review, 64(2), pp. 467-500. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4566945
Lobling, L., Handschigl, C., Hofmann, K. & Schwedhelm, J. 2023. Navigating the Legal Landscape: Technical Implementation of Copyright Reservations for Text and Data Mining in the Era of Al Language Models. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 14(4), pp. 499-409.
Lu, F. 2024. AI-Generated Content: Legal Challenges & Potential Reforms. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 66(1), pp. 174-181. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/66/2024MU0035
Malevé, N. 2024. Lost in Compression: Models of Authorship in Generative AI. Media Theory, 8(1), pp. 205-228. https://doi.org/10.70064/mt.v8i1.1074
Margoni, T. & Kretschmer, M. 2022. A Deeper Look into the EU Text and Data Mining Exceptions: Harmonisation, Data Ownership, and the Future of Technology. GRUR International, 71(8), pp. 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac054
Mešević, I. R. 2024. Umjetna inteligencija i mediji: The New York Times Company protiv kompanija Open AI i Microsoft. In: Popović, D.V. (ed.), Veštačka inteligencija - izazovi u poslovnom pravu, Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, pp. 53-79. https://doi.org/10.51204/Internet_Dijalog_2403A
Moerland, A. 2024. Tekst- en datamining over de grens. Ars Aequi, Special issue, pp. 682-681.
Montgomery, B. 2025. Disney and Universal sue AI image creator Midjourney, alleging copyright infringement. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jun/11/disney-universal-ai-lawsuit, 11. 6. 2025.
Murray, M. D. 2023. Generative AI Art: Copyright Infringement and Fair Use. SMU Science and Technology Law Review, 26(2), pp. 259-316. https://doi.org/10.25172/smustlr.26.2.4
Napitupulu, P. A., Sinaga, C. A. F. & Hasugian, A. L. P. 2023. The Implication of Generative Artificial Intelligence towards Intellectual Property Rights (Examining the Multifaceted Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Intellectual Property Rights). West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(3), pp. 274-284. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.330
Orlando, S. & Casalini, L. 2023. The inexistence of an exclusive right of Text and Data Mining (TDM) as a matter of EU copyright law. SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4578122
Perišić, J. Ć., 2025. Razvoj industrije veštačke inteligencije u Evropskoj uniji: izazovi i perspektive. In: Šarkić, N. (ed.), Zbornik radova sa Savetovanja pravnika: [XXVIII Savetovanje Budvanski pravnički dani, Budva, June 2025. Belgrade: Udruženje pravnika Srbije, pp. 613-628.
Popović, D. V. 2024. Ograničenja autorskog i srodnih prava: prepreka ili podsticaj razvoju veštačke inteligencije. In: Popović, D. V. (ed.), Veštačka inteligencija - izazovi u poslovnom pravu, Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu Pravni fakultet, pp. 33-52. https://doi.org/10.51204/Internet_Dijalog_2402A
Radovanović, S. 2018. Otvorena nauka i autorsko pravo, s posebnim osvrtom na Predlog direktive EU o autorskom pravu na jedinstvenom digitalnom tržištu. In: Popović, D. V. (ed.), Intelektualna svojina i internet. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, pp. 21-36. https://doi.org/10.51204/Internet_Dijalog_1802A
Rosati, E. 2019. Copyright as an Obstacle or an Enabler: A European Perspective on Text and Data Mining and Its Role in the Development of AI Creativity. Asia Pacific Law Review, 27(2), pp. 198-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2019.1705525
Sag, M. 2023. Copyright Safety for Generative AI. Houston Law Review, 61(2), pp. 295-348. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4438593
Sag, M. 2024. Fairness and Fair Use in Generative AI. Fordham Law Review, 92(5), pp. 1887-1922.
Senftleben, M. 2022. Compliance of National TDM Rules with International Copyright Law – An Overrated Nonissue?. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 53(10), pp. 1477-1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01266-8
Sobel, B. L. 2024. Elements of Style: Copyright, Similarity, and Generative AI. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 38(1), pp. 49-106. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4832872
Szkalej, K. 2025. The Paradox of Lawful Text and Data Mining? Some Experiences from the Research Sector and Where We (Should) Go from Here. GRUR International, 74(4), pp. 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaf029
Toth, A. K. 2019. Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement and AI: Issues and Potential Solutions, through the Lens of Text and Data Mining. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 13(2), pp. 361-388. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2019-2-9
Widła, B. 2025. Thou Shalt Not Conduct Research on Software? Text and Data Mining of Computer Programs in the Current EU Copyright Framework. GRUR International, 74(1), pp. 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikae147
Živković, A. Đ., 2024. Pravni okvir zaštite računarskih programa sa posebnim osvrtom na veštačku inteligenciju „ChatGPT“. Strani pravni život, 68(3), pp. 317-338. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_24301KJ
Legal Sources
Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC. 2019. Official Journal L 130, 17 May 2019, pp. 92–125.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828. 2024. Official Journal L, pp. 2024/1689, 12 July 2024.
The Code of Law of United States of America. 2024.
Case Law
Kneschke v. LAION, Hamburg Regional Court (Landsgericht Hamburg) of 27 September 2024, (Urteil 310 O.22723), available at https://openjur.de/u/2495651.html [Accessed 8 December 2025].
Getty Images vs. Stability AI, 2025, High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales of 4 November 2025, Case No: IL-2023-000007, EWHC 2863 (Ch), available at https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Getty-Images-v-Stability-AI.pdf [Accessed 8 December 2025].
GEMA vs OpenAI, Munich Regional Court (Landsgericht München), First Chamber, of 11 November 2025, (Urteil 42 O 14139/24), available at https://openjur.de/u/2537592.html [Accessed 8 December 2025].